Skip to main content
Suggest a service
Compare

Bisq vs BasicSwap

Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.

BI
Bisq
8.7/10 L0Trustless
BA
BasicSwap
9.1/10 L0Trustless
Visit Bisq Visit BasicSwap

Verdict

Higher trust score: BasicSwap

Based on our trust scoring, BasicSwap comes out ahead of Bisq (9.1 vs 8.7). The gap reflects differences in KYC stance, custody model and operational track record.

Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.

Score breakdown

Overall /10
Bisq 8.7 Good
BasicSwap 9.1 Good
Privacy /100
Bisq 100 Good
BasicSwap 100 Good
Trust /100
Bisq 80 Good
BasicSwap 86 Good

Side by side

KYC level L0Trustless L0Trustless
Tagline Decentralised P2P Bitcoin exchange with on-chain multisig escrow — no signup, no custody, desktop and mobile apps routed through Tor by default, with DAO governance and AGPL-3.0 source code. Cross-chain atomic-swap DEX from the Particl Project, run locally as a self-hosted node with Docker — trustless BTC↔XMR swaps via adaptor signatures, no accounts, no fees, MIT-licensed.
Jurisdiction No HQ No HQ
Founded 2014 2020
Tor / .onion No No
Categories Exchange, DEX, P2P Exchange, DEX, P2P

Feature comparison 10

Bisq BasicSwap
Bitcoin (BTC)
Accepts Monero (XMR)
Non-custodial
Open source
No signup required
Tor (.onion) available
Peer-to-peer
Accepts fiat
Mobile app
Available worldwide

Read the full reviews

The side-by-side covers the headlines — the detail pages walk through every claim and citation.