Skip to main content
Suggest a service
Compare

Hodl Hodl vs Bisq

Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.

HO
Hodl Hodl
8.9/10 L1Anonymous
BI
Bisq
8.7/10 L0Trustless
Visit Hodl Hodl Visit Bisq

Verdict

Effectively tied

Both services score within a hair of each other (8.9 vs 8.7). Pick based on the specific feature you need — see the row-by-row breakdown below.

Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.

Score breakdown

Overall /10
Hodl Hodl 8.9 Good
Bisq 8.7 Good
Privacy /100
Hodl Hodl 100 Good
Bisq 100 Good
Trust /100
Hodl Hodl 88 Good
Bisq 80 Good

Side by side

KYC level L1Anonymous L0Trustless
Tagline Non-custodial P2P Bitcoin marketplace with 2-of-3 multisig escrow, running since 2016 — 100+ fiat currencies, 300+ payment methods, 0.5-0.6% fees. Email required but no ID; US not served. Decentralised P2P Bitcoin exchange with on-chain multisig escrow — no signup, no custody, desktop and mobile apps routed through Tor by default, with DAO governance and AGPL-3.0 source code.
Jurisdiction United Kingdom (Hodlex Ltd) No HQ
Founded 2016 2014
Tor / .onion No No
Categories Exchange, P2P Exchange, DEX, P2P

Feature comparison 11

Hodl Hodl Bisq
Bitcoin (BTC)
Cash
Non-custodial
Open source
No signup required
Tor (.onion) available
Peer-to-peer
Accepts fiat
Mobile app
Available worldwide
Requires email

Read the full reviews

The side-by-side covers the headlines — the detail pages walk through every claim and citation.