Skip to main content
Suggest a service
Compare

Swapter vs Bisq

Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.

SW
Swapter
5.6/10 L2Discreet
BI
Bisq
8.7/10 L0Trustless
Visit Swapter Visit Bisq

Verdict

Higher trust score: Bisq

Based on our trust scoring, Bisq comes out ahead of Swapter (8.7 vs 5.6). The gap reflects differences in KYC stance, custody model and operational track record.

Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.

Score breakdown

Overall /10
Swapter 5.6 Average
Bisq 8.7 Good
Privacy /100
Swapter 70 Good
Bisq 100 Good
Trust /100
Swapter 48 Weak
Bisq 80 Good

Side by side

KYC level L2Discreet L0Trustless
Tagline Instant crypto exchange supporting 1,200+ assets across 450+ networks — no signup, wallet-to-wallet swaps in minutes, but a risk-scoring engine can pause transactions and demand full KYC. Decentralised P2P Bitcoin exchange with on-chain multisig escrow — no signup, no custody, desktop and mobile apps routed through Tor by default, with DAO governance and AGPL-3.0 source code.
Jurisdiction Ukraine No HQ
Founded 2022 2014
Tor / .onion No No
Categories Exchange, Aggregator Exchange, DEX, P2P

Feature comparison 13

Swapter Bisq
Bitcoin (BTC)
Accepts Monero (XMR) —
Non-custodial —
Open source —
No signup required
Tor (.onion) available —
Peer-to-peer —
Accepts fiat —
Mobile app —
Web app —
Instant —
Available worldwide
Custodial —

Read the full reviews

The side-by-side covers the headlines — the detail pages walk through every claim and citation.