Skip to main content
Suggest a service
Compare

Kraken vs IVPN

Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.

KR
Kraken
4.8/10 L5Mandatory
IV
IVPN
9.3/10 L1Anonymous
Visit Kraken Visit IVPN

Verdict

Higher trust score: IVPN

Based on our trust scoring, IVPN comes out ahead of Kraken (9.3 vs 4.8). The gap reflects differences in KYC stance, custody model and operational track record.

Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.

Score breakdown

Overall /10
Kraken 4.8 Weak
IVPN 9.3 Good
Privacy /100
Kraken 2 Poor
IVPN 100 Good
Trust /100
Kraken 68 Average
IVPN 95 Good

Side by side

KYC level L5Mandatory L1Anonymous
Tagline Veteran US-regulated exchange founded 2011 with 600+ assets, full mandatory KYC, and bi-annual proof-of-reserves audits — listed here as a comparison baseline for custodial KYC platforms, not as a no-KYC option. Gibraltar-based VPN with anonymous account numbers — no email, no KYC — accepting Monero, Bitcoin and cash by mail, with six consecutive Cure53 no-logs audits and fully open-source apps.
Jurisdiction United States Gibraltar
Founded 2011 2009
Tor / .onion No No
Categories Exchange VPN, Privacy

Feature comparison 12

Kraken IVPN
Bitcoin (BTC)
Accepts Monero (XMR)
Cash
Non-custodial
Open source
Lightning Network
Accepts fiat
Mobile app
Web app
Available worldwide
Custodial
Requires email

Read the full reviews

The side-by-side covers the headlines — the detail pages walk through every claim and citation.