Skip to main content
Suggest a service
Compare

Proxy4G vs BasicSwap

Two no-KYC services head-to-head — KYC stance, custody model, attributes and our trust score, side by side.

PR
Proxy4G
9.6/10 L1Anonymous
BA
BasicSwap
9.1/10 L0Trustless
Visit Proxy4G Visit BasicSwap

Verdict

Higher trust score: Proxy4G

Based on our trust scoring, Proxy4G comes out ahead of BasicSwap (9.6 vs 9.1). The gap reflects differences in KYC stance, custody model and operational track record.

Note: Scores are our independent assessment. Both services have valid use cases — read each detail page before deciding.

Score breakdown

Overall /10
Proxy4G 9.6 Good
BasicSwap 9.1 Good
Privacy /100
Proxy4G 77 Good
BasicSwap 100 Good
Trust /100
Proxy4G 99 Good
BasicSwap 86 Good

Side by side

KYC level L1Anonymous L0Trustless
Tagline Real mobile 4G and 5G proxies across 18 countries and 41 carriers — dedicated or shared, HTTP, HTTPS and SOCKS5 — crypto-only checkout with a single email field and no KYC. Cross-chain atomic-swap DEX from the Particl Project, run locally as a self-hosted node with Docker — trustless BTC↔XMR swaps via adaptor signatures, no accounts, no fees, MIT-licensed.
Jurisdiction United Kingdom No HQ
Founded 2026 2020
Tor / .onion No No
Categories Proxy store, Privacy Exchange, DEX, P2P

Feature comparison 12

Proxy4G BasicSwap
Bitcoin (BTC)
Accepts Monero (XMR)
Non-custodial
Open source
No signup required
Tor (.onion) available
Peer-to-peer
Web app
Instant
Available worldwide
Requires email
Logs IP addresses

Read the full reviews

The side-by-side covers the headlines — the detail pages walk through every claim and citation.